In accordance with most published reports, the proposed criteria conceptualize VM as an episodic vestibular disorder.
Oh really? I thought the whole problem with MAV'ers is that they're often misdiagnosed as having some kind of a vestibular disorder, like labs or VN. Haven't we here at MVert unofficially "established" that MAV can AFFECT the vestibular system but doesn't ORIGINATE there? Secondly, why "episodic"? What about those of us (like MAVLisa and me) who have it
constantly, not in attacks?
The first diagnostic step is distinguishing between vertigo (a vestibular symptom) and nonvestibular dizziness. This distinction can usually be made by a careful history: a sense of rotation or other illusory sensations of motion indicate vertigo; whereas sensations of lightheadedness, dizziness, or impending faint imply nonvestibular dizziness.
First they called MAV "a vestibular disorder" and now they're confusing the issue by talking about what's vestibular and what isn't. (So when they say "nonvestibular dizziness" above, does that mean "migrainous dizziness" or the opposite?)
But more to the point, Isn't this overgeneralizing? Don't we have "definite" MAV'ers here whose dizziness IS (or HAS BECOME) more than just abstract dizziness? MAVLisa gradually had her MAV turn into more of a rocking sensation (or at least that rocking was added to the existing symptoms). Bottom-line question to the authors: "When dizziness/MAV progresses from one distinct form to another, then what? How do you classify dizziness that changes appearance?"